1. The Committee of Vigilance promptly arrested the Knapp brothers and sent them to the Salem Gaol, their cells not far from those occupied by the Crowninshields.
12. That's why I gave you this other example, because it seems to me that in a way, the other example is more compelling than that of Knapp and Michaels.
13. After just five hours of deliberation the jury accepted Webster's contention that Frank Knapp was a principal to the crime and convicted him of murder.
14. This, too, is a neo-pragmatist position. Now you notice that in the third part of the Knapp and Michaels essay, they engage in a kind of polite disagreement with Fish.
15. If we accept this idea, then there's a very strong case for Knapp and Michaels being right. Really there's no significant or important difference between language and speech.
16. That's not at all the same thing as to say, according to the claim of Knapp and Michaels, that in deconstructive thinking texts have no meaning -a very, very different proposition altogether.
17. Now the implication of this is clear, and it's the implication that Knapp and Michaels draw on in this argument. Their claim is that there is no distinction to be made between language and speech.
18. Now the implication of this is clear, and it's the implication that Knapp and Michaels draw on in this argument. Their claim is that there is no distinction to be made between language and speech.