1. 结果齐拉西酮组总有效率为64.29%,明显高于酮组的42.85%。
Results The overall efficacy rate of ziprasidone (64.29%) was higher than that of risperidone (42.85%).

来自互联网

2. 结果利培社会功能缺陷评分低于氯氮平,生活质量评分明显高于氯氮平
Results Compared with clozapine group, the score of social function deficiency was lower and that of life quality higher.

来自互联网

3. 结果:治疗后氯氮平血清催乳素水平没有显著变化,而利培酮组血清催乳素水平显著升高。
Results: The serum prolactin levels of risperidone treated patients increased significantly 10 weeks later, while those of clozapine treated patients showed no obvious change.

来自互联网

4. 利培酮锥体外系不良反应和内分泌改变的发生均明显高于阿立呱唑(P均
The incidences of extra-pyramidal symptoms and endocrine change in Risperidone group were obviously higher than those in Aripiprazole group(P

来自互联网

5. 在奥氮平的基础上,酮组和喹硫平增加单位效果所需成本比较,利培酮组小于喹硫平
Based on the olanzapine group, the unit effectiveness cost in amount increase was smaller in the risperdal group than in the quetiapine group.

来自互联网

6. 治疗6、8周末TESS评分,齐拉西均低于利培酮组,两有显著性差异(P
The scores of TESS of study group were significantly lower than those of control group at 6, 8 weekend (P

来自互联网

7. 结果丁二酸洛沙平与对精神分裂症疗效及副反应相似,洛沙平显效率76.66%,利培酮组显效率73.34%。
Results Curative effects and side effects of loxapine succinate were similar to that of risperidone. The effectual rate of the former was 76.66% and the latter was 73.34%.

来自互联网

8. 结果:利培酮血糖发生改变8例(8%),氯氮平21例(21%),两比较,差异有统计学意义(P
Results: Risperidone group of blood sugar change 8 cases (8%), clozapine group of 21 cases (21%), two groups of comparisons, the difference was statistically significant (P

来自互联网

9. 结果:、奥氮平和奎硫平的显效率分别为44%、88%、76%,奥氮平和奎硫平的疗效要好于利培酮组
Results:The response rates of risperidone group 44%, olanzapine group 88%, and seroquel group 76%, olanzapine group and seroquel group demonstrated higher efficacy than risperidone group.

来自互联网

10. 方法:对116例老年器质性精神障碍患者随机分为两,分别服用利培酮或奋乃静。
Method: 116 patients of elderly brain organic mental disorders were randomly assigned to two groups to receive risperidone and perphenazine respectively for 6 weeks.

来自互联网

11. 结果 奎硫平治疗有效率为70.0%,利培酮治疗有效率为66.7%,两比较差异无显著性。
Results The effective rate of qutiapine was 70.0% and risperidone 66.7%, which showed no significant difference.

来自互联网

12. 结果 奎硫平治疗有效率为70.0%,利培酮治疗有效率为66.7%,两比较差异无显著性。
Results The effective rate of qutiapine was 70.0% and risperidone 66.7%, which showed no significant difference.

来自互联网